|
Virginia
Tech Tragedy Report Misses Point
NewsMax
June
20, 2007
A
leading expert on mass violence has taken issue with
a presidential task force report delving into the Virginia
Tech shootings
and school violence in general, saying it fails to address
the key issues.
The
report, released to the public on June 13, was issued
by a panel that included Michael Leavitt, Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human Services, and Attorney
General Alberto Gonzales,
and was officially titled "Report to the President
on Issues Raised by the Virginia Tech Tragedy."
But
Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, a former West Point instructor,
declared: "I think they missed the boat."
Grossman
is the author of several book including the Pulitzer
Prize-nominated "On
Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in
War and Society," which is required reading for
FBI recruits.
After reading the government report, Grossman told NewsMax
exclusively:
"All
they are reporting on is largely mental illness, sharing
information about threatening individuals, keeping guns
out of the
hands of the mentally ill, getting help to mentally ill
people, and improving emergency preparedness and violence
prevention.
"A
full spectrum plan looks at: Deter, Detect, Delay, and
Defeat."
Grossman elaborated on each of the four points:
"Deter:
The killer can be deterred. That is why there are seldom
any successful workplace massacres in police stations.
We need to start putting pressure on schools that refuse
to arm their police.
"Most
colleges and universities are small cities. Any city
leadership that refused to arm their cops, and then had
people murdered, would be put out business at the next
election. We entrust our kids in the care of organizations
that neglect the most fundamental aspect of public safety:
armed cops.
"And
of course we have the whole issue of not permitting concealed
weapons permits to apply on campus. These are laws that
disarm law-abiding citizens, and attract killers who want
a body
count."
On "Detect," Lt.
Col Grossman told NewsMax:
"The
whole focus of the president's task force report was
on detecting mentally ill killers before they strike.
But most of the high school killers were not mentally
ill. The kids that gave us Jonesboro in the middle school
and Columbine in the high school are now showing up in
the
colleges. And the high schools are getting very good at
identifying these wannabe killers. All the methodologies
learned in blood in the high schools now must be applied
in the college.
"An
alternative is to identify ('detect') and list in a nationaldatabase
all the colleges that refuse to arm their police, and
to recommend that parents not send their kids to these
colleges. Instead of trying to detect the killer, just
detect the negligent schools."
As
for "Delay," Grossman says: "This generally
means lockdown drills and securable facilities. Lockdown
is to violence what fire drills are to fire. Every classroom
must be quickly securable. How many teachers and professors
and students have to die blocking doors with their bodies
before we learn this lesson?
"Also,
every classroom must have two exits, even if one is out
the window. And colleges have to do lockdown drills,
just like high schools. The faculty must be briefed on
where and how to secure their students.
"Defeat:
This brings us back to our cops again. First, armed cops
need to be onsite. The Virginia Tech shooter killed 32
in nine minutes. How many more would he have killed if
armed police were not onsite?
"Secondly,
the police need rifles so they can defeat body armor
(the high school killer of seven at Red Lake, Minn.,
was wearing body armor) and so they can effectively engage
snipers. The campus
police need SWAT teams trained in explosive breaching so
they can quickly and effectively respond to barricaded
gunmen scenarios.
"Remember,
if a gunman is trapped in a bank or convenience store
with hostages, he isn't there to kill people. But if
a gunman takes hostages in a school, he can be there
for only one purpose: to kill
kids and to carve his name in history in your children's
blood."
The
expert concludes: "In these scenarios, seconds
equal lives, and just as colleges have fire hoses and fire
extinguishers on site, they need to have the tools to
respond to violence on site.
"If
they are not going to permit their citizens (students
and faculty) to carry lifesaving tools (firearms), then
they must provide those lifesaving tools, in the hands
of trained professionals. This is a moral, legal obligation."
(c) NewsMax 2007. All rights reserved. |